granfield-estate.com

Mr. Chairman, outstanding members of the european parliament, members of the secretariat, supporters of her comrade -in -arms:

I can congratulate you, sir, on the elections for the maximum position. Your wisdom and feeling will become fundamental for driving this forum, which is unique in this mandate in the great trouble of europeans in the parliament between the elections that we have recently witnessed. It is they who bring me fears first first by the committee today. I had an intention to thank you for inviting me and my colleagues here at the moment on an interest of an interest, at what point a very desired report on the recent mission to select facts (ffm) will be discussed to valencia, and people trust and have been accepted and acted. I also want to thank the ffm members and the secretariat for their dirty service in the role of speakers and developers of the report in front of you today. I am pleased that it still has members of the coordinated association, abusos urbanisticos no, denia and castellon. The consensus on february 17, by the protection of the sending of a mission to find facts to valencia, to investigate the abuse of regional lands, shortcomings and deviations recognized even by the valencian authorities themselves. At that time, as a report, predicted today, it was created according to vast discussions only with a representative sample of the victims of such abuse, it should be noted that the mission to look for the facts also requested a corporate party with some high-ranking municipal and regional officials in valencia. Their views are at the same time noted in the modern report. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy and regrettable that no representatives of the valensian community itself, at the political level, found themselves in power to provide themselves with acceptable for a party with a delegation from the senior political institute of europe or to be a remarkable meeting here.

It is much regrettable that the representatives of the valencian government, in private at the ministerial level, went too much that they publicly slandered the mission and really, his report quotes any such as "farce" and in their favorite way " politically motivated. " I understood that the official removal of such poorly informed comments were transmitted by valencian representatives, and people share the hope of which a greater cult granfield-estate.com of this parliament will be shown in the future.

The actual examples of the victimization are given, which, if neither systematic nor the laws intended in the current realities, are sufficiently extensively fashionable and deeply negative in the situation of many european people and inhabitants, which can be constant concern regarding this body and other eu organs. Specifically, commission and court. The representative of the commission will not remind at our first meeting that our confectioners are obliged and completely, we recognize the competence of the regions in spain, for example, land laws, of course, to the spanish constitution and transcendental national and american laws, we are satisfied with the commission began to actively investigate complaints filed in the water, especially when violations of the eu’s rights and the instability of laws by analogy with the german agreements, where spain is the state party, for example, the amsterdam agreement, occurred. In fact, over the past 3-5 kg of months, the commission was submitted by a number of well-documented complaints, also agreed to start the investigation that could well end in court. Separately, i will be able to introduce this association working on the protection of the rights of owners of office buildings and the surrounding atmosphere collects information from the gifts of land rules that are soon able to find justice in echr, in case this does not prove the spanish judicial system possible or timely at many levels.

, Without commenting on the main problem of this main contribution, we believe that, since the valencian authorities publicly criticized european institutions here, it resorts to the european commission to preserve the new government of madrid for blocking the new government the mass project distry river river, which, incidentally, did not even receive the support of the commission. Valencia quotes in this situation, namely, the lack of transparency, possible violations of the eu directives, the lack of public consultations on direct spent, the lack of data on the price and benefits of the project (benificios), there is little or no public exposure project, a compressed term for response, and this decision is making decisions contradicts constitutional principles. Such a topic can be a page from our internal work on land laws.Such has the opportunity to point out the acquired and welcoming faith, so far without the approach of valencia to the european union for the most part considered as a supplier of funds, official and unofficial, but not as a trade union, membership rules, membership rules, must be stored completely respected.

mr. The chairman, i believe that the representatives of valencian are assuring this committee, that what abuses were attested earlier (and publicly recognized by the current and previous responsible ministers), they will be completed according to new land legislation, rather incorrectly named in english ears. Luv (ley urbanistica valenciana), on what days and suddenly, we express the confidence that using the services in 2019 he will move after the end of the regional legislative body, this year, as he had recently promised. I remember that despite the fact that the current leading side was opposed to the adoption of lrau, it was seriously criticized by the new proposed law, which was done then. However, as soon as the power was occupied by the authorities in 1995, for several years this agree, nothing has done anything to reform this law. In the face of criticism, the government at this time has made a draft of the new law, but so far it seems the most difficult, longer and contains some of the tourists of problem areas. Indeed, this draft is only the first of the packages of legislation, which will avoid understanding of all other than experts, they usually look for employment with developers. Its representative may continue to argue that the “charter” rule on the legal boundaries and obligations of real estate owners should first appear. In fact, there are only two posts about the legal boundaries and a large number of rivals for obligations in this project. The opposite is true for the privileges and duties of developers. With the help of this, it will not be told that the obligations are imposed on many of them unfortunate real estate owners much outpass any rights that they have every chance to provide, when most of them are guaranteed in the spanish constitution (article 33) or european legislation. The dispute with the norms of article ii.17 of the eu constitution project will also be more radical, especially who recently the elected government of the spanish language in general announced a possible compliance with such an agreement and promised to sign it through a few months. </>

It turned out that any recommendations of the regional ombudsman, nominated several years ago in an unprecedented bold and highly critical report on current land laws - were adopted to a new law? Apparently it is a reality, but is it when the responsible minister, the senior and publicly, the two serious proposals were rejected by the responsible minister, the senior blasko? By the way, he proved it to me personally less than 2 weeks ago, shortly before the moment his office was published by an imaginary press release regarding the work of our meeting. It seems that he and i attended individual meetings together! Of course, our employees did not discuss, silent already the fact of agreeing, most of the fundamental factors in their supposedly “joint statement of the press”. And such an incident once when he and concrete officials were engaged in glaring manipulations with media. And the person will do this, despite the fact that such previous three in writing attempts were ignored or lost in any bureaucratic paper storm, i regret it. Although this process continues, the actual problems continue, and the new schemes will be approved promptly and do not require separate attention to the consequences other than financial rewards, one recent example of 52,000 complaints filed against the plan in godella, near valencia. The disaster in the ancient salins of calpe, mentioned in the confirming documentation in front of your nose, is now literally leaving the ransom framework, i also mourn to inform. It seems that there is a fever, possibly caused by fear that if europe is watching now, the game of seizure of land can soon end. The field is still extremely gorgeous. But in this case, this repeats them even more bold relief. In addition to food, that help is delighted for a lawyer and of course, is a nightmare of the owner or owner of the economy for 200 pages of poorly defined and mysterious terminology, there are several paragraphs that are frightened, really for all those who make property owners.For example, the project of article 109, where it is announced in a short translation that each plan by default implies an announcement of public communal work or benefit and, accordingly, brings a concomitant requirement for property classes, annuls rights, including any inherited interests necessary for promotion, expropriation or expropriation or "servidumbers". Trigger, meanwhile, can be translated as slavery (according to larus speeches), but suggests that this means at least serious restrictions after future use by the owners. There are no independent indicators in a semantic word for such a game in a semantic word, and, according to article 107, almost without time in order to respond to such dragon imposition - less than two weeks. This must be an improvement? The organization, on the other hand, delegated the developer (article 118), which needs to develop not only a square meter of land, absolutely exactly with such a law, then can (for example, corresponding to article 23) in order to invite “mandatory” sessions up to 60 % of the soil and - a bonus to the demand for extinctioning infrastructure expenses for the lack of a testing mechanism so that they do not leave the slightest concern about the court prohibition through the courts, since for various practical purposes this is not in spain. The town hall, of course, acquires an additional slice, plus licensed fees from the developer, which he himself chose within the very opaque and secretive process (see our complaint to the secretary of the european commission).

george orwell would find a really generous crop in land laws for his own work more than 50 years ago. He was in spain in those days when the communist second republic presented in its constitution the vague concepts of 1931, like “social curiosity and“ public benefits ”in order to legitimize ruthless agrarian reform. We do not forget where it leads. Now usually, this is a small owner of real estate, as evidenced by a nuance that using the services of a report of a mission that is painful. It is curious that this method also turns out to be applied according to the new law, no worse than spain is trying to attract more and more buyers of foreign property housing in the role of the main and necessary source of direct investment. This can be seen with the naked eye in order to “cost and form” them massively in high lifts, already breaking the serious part of the once beautiful line of the coast. This is the tactics of “vertical development”, which is currently preferred by the valencian government. Torrevieja and benidorm enter their heads. Alas, both have a single of the highest criminal statistics in spain. Torrevieja is actually the best, let benidorm have higher buildings. By the way, the minister himself uses a strange twisted dialectics, based on victims of land laws as “beneficiaries”, and serious abuse will become simply “insignificant shortcomings”.

Solve the difficulties. Alas, ignoring the law, including indirected by various interested governments, as evidenced by the report, rampant. Even worse, for a nominally catholic country, at least two commandments of god almighty, when it is announced that it is not enough to steal ”and you will not crave your neighbor’s property and will never bear a false witness” against him ”, it seems, decreases into sinful ignoring regularly, as the report suggests. A solar country with a similar amount of shady affairs, so some say.

Mr. Chairman, we are satisfied with the statement that the given report was allowed and made so carefully with the joy of such a valuable forum of the european parliament. For the above - near the institutions of new europe, where the rights of all who are here must be downloaded as a result, protected, not counting the boundaries of states or regions, if their first defense lines are insufficient or summarize them. I am very sorry about the fact that this failure in the country, where i have about 15,000 signed up in our petition (our company still receive paintings and requests for help), presenting, undoubtedly, perennials of this number that were born there or want to make valencia home to the giving field our team hopes and hope for security and consultation that contains this report will become entirely accepted by parliament, and what useful thing the formal expression of anxiety will be transmitted to the maximum and valensi authorities, and that this problem continues to be open preliminary by the committee . We also expect that the simple existence of the report will serve to encourage the valencian government to honor his promises and make a lot of efforts, then to immediately make new legislation. We ask the new government in madrid to provide prescribed complete duties, respectively by the constitution and its national legislation at the level of rights of all whose houses are at risk under regional administrators.The chairman, the valencian government often promised improvements, however, at the end of large demonstrations and a huge variety of adverse local and european media comments (el pais, el mundo, levante, informacion, las provincias, financial times, the international hereld tribun e, focus, telegraaf , express, daily mail, cnn, bbc, granada, itn, ard (munchen), suddeutsche zeitung, among other). Still, especially if you take into account, this is already sufficiently seized according to the current land legislation, lrau and dozens, if not hundreds of building structures for many years, our company does not make sense, why the valencian government will not be able to accept logical the essence of the costs is a farewell move, as an expression of its sincerity, to declare an immediate moratorium on the approval of new development plans. This is waiting for the entry because of the new law, luv or an alternative way, which introduces to the law of the russian region in the same way, equally how its membership is increasing, and such a parliament implies greater power. Alas, although the current insanity of construction happens, people do not campaign to stop this program for practical reasons. Instead of training, we are sure that free market energy, if not in the inevitable and in the new millennium, probably ruptures of the real estate bubble, under any circumstances will quickly reduce this to a sustainable level.

And branches, all volunteers, but not for earnings, are widely called abusos urbanistos no. Due to food that people observed in our region, if we prefer a name for the back of the issue, that is, contractors , promoters, city of halls and regional officials, which, as a rule, accuse others of abuse, we would advise, somewhere a collectively abusos urbanisticos si (aus). Finally, we would have met the most happy if abuse, among which they were mentioned in the report, everyone live happily, once, not only with a warm climate, but meanwhile there is only one. Use https://granfield-estate.com/, you have the opportunity to contact the email from the project.